- Joined
- Sep 13, 2021
- Messages
- 1,289
- Reaction score
- 3,418
No you subjectively disagree on what is objective.You seem to confuse objective and subjective a lot.
My opinion is not popularJust because you subscribe to a popular opinion
By the judging criteria present for the IFBB back in the 70s, todays top competitors objectively (yes objectively) are superior to the physiques of that erra. They are larger, leaner, and more balanced. this is not opinion, this is objective reality, just because you dont agree doesnt make it not objective., that doesn't mean it is a fact when it comes to what people choose to believe about the Golden Era.
I dont have a time machine, so i cant go back in time and kill hitler as an infant. does that mean we cant say that this would have been objectively better for the European jewish community at the time?Unless you have a time machine, you can't prove shit and you are no pro or a judge, so why do you think your opinion is more relevant than anyone else here?
Im happy to discuss WHY someone might have a different opinion than me, but they have to at least bring something more to the table then "ArNoLd iS tHe GoAt, herp derp, i like their physiques better"
I dont see any post that i edited, which post are you referring too.Kind of like your initial post before you edited
And i stand by that, its a free country, im nobody heres dad, they can take whatever and however much of anything they want.when you said no intelligent protocol includes Dbol.
But from the aspect of strictly lasting performance outcomes, dbol comes up short and other options do everything it does better.
If you like dbol, great, have at it, but that doesnt change the fact that there are better tools for whatever job you want dbol to do.
"i did a 1g tren only cycle, it worked for me"You don't know what works for others and you are not the judge of what an intelligent choice is for someone else.
does that make it an intelligent choice?
Go reread every response ive made to this thread.Its almost like you want to argue with people when you come across with your negative assumptions.
I entered this thread to provide my input as to why there is so much hate for dbol.
smooth brained individuals then failed the reading comprehension check and argued with a point i was not making, and i corrected them.
If people are going to respond to my comments with ignorance and stupidity im not going to hold their hand and gently coddle their fragile internet egos. my delivery is fine, i respond in kind.Work on your delivery bro. I agree with some of your opinions but you come across as ignorant and simple minded when you keep stating your opinions as facts.
Have a happy Christmas





