Clen, t3 caffeine, stims etc. hgh, frag, igf, slu pp 332, Cardarine etc et



I'll second this. Started GW0742 a few weeks ago at 20mg/day mainly for the positive HDL impacts. I have noticed an increase in cardio ability, but negligible, if any, midline fat oxidation.Cardarine: never tried it for fat loss. Hella cardio though.
Yep. It’s the last to go, other than adipose tissue/visceral fat around the organs.Gotta starve......
Your post is good info on burning calories, but none of that is going to specifically spot reduce fat, which is what was asked by OP. Trust me, I wish spot reduction was a thing. Unfortunately, you just have to get lean enough to get rid of what the individual holds most.You can go on forever about oral supplements, because so many are important but most are well known, so I am not listing them here. Hope this helps!
Fat around the obliques. Lower abs. Lower back.

Fasted 30 mins cycling in the mornings on tesamorelin and retatrutide melt my visceral fat from 20 to 7 in 6 months - lost 45 pounds during that time.Fat around the obliques. Lower abs. Lower back.
That stubborn super hard body fat that loves to accumulate in men. Can be tricky to address.
What are your two favorite and most effective exercises you have found to eliminate said issue?
Also if you wanna name off compounds or suppz or diet that helped you achieve said goal by all means name those here!
Looking to see if a pattern emerges or If our crew can agree on a few specific exercises to.address this area.
Looking for an informative , experience based thread to help all members here achieve their goals.
Thanks guys![]()
I was thinking (no localized fat loss is possible) just you like up until I started using tesamorelin and retatrutide together 6 months ago. I lost weight before but this time it is different, belly fat and love handles melt as fast as other parts of my body. BTW appreciate your messages, you are quite knowledgeable and share different views which is invaluable - much appreciated.Your post is good info on burning calories, but none of that is going to specifically spot reduce fat, which is what was asked by OP. Trust me, I wish spot reduction was a thing. Unfortunately, you just have to get lean enough to get rid of what the individual holds most.
Thank you for the shout out. Much appreciated.I was thinking (no localized fat loss is possible) just you like up until I started using tesamorelin and retatrutide together 6 months ago. I lost weight before but this time it is different, belly fat and love handles melt as fast as other parts of my body. BTW appreciate your messages, you are quite knowledgeable and share different views which is invaluable - much appreciated.

Read all the studies and clinical data as I wanted this to be good, but it's extremely underwhelming/insignificant. That's why it's not spoken about much. Just use more growth.@GYMnTONIC do you have any experience with AOD 9604? I know it's supposed to be a fragmented version of HGH and mimic the fat burning properties, but I don't see it being talked about much.
I appreciate you jumping in and was hoping someone would verify my thoughts. I just recently heard of it and started reading alot. You're right. Underwheling at best. I didnt even find much info here of anyone other than one member using it and a few that just mentioned it.it's extremely underwhelming/insignificant
@Meetketchup this is "targeted fat" related so I am curious about your thoughts on fasted cardio vs. fed cardio. Depending on which article you read, the narratives are completely opposite. I find there to be truth on both sides, but I tend to lean towards the side of "doesn't really matter" because ultimately, fat loss is dependent upon a caloric average over time. I could be entirely wrong based upon glycogen and cortisol effects, but when I hear "fasted cardio" my brain interprets this as the equivalent of saying:
It will cost me more money if I grocery shop before I deposit my check rather than going after I deposit my check.
Money comes out, money goes in. Same money, regardless of the order. Again, curious about your thoughts and if I'm missing something.
Correct. There is no significant difference "net" wise (at the end of the day) between fasted and fed cardio. This has been shown time and time again via studies and in real life. The only argument I see that may have some relevance is if you are super lean and using clen/ephedrine/yohimbe fasted, but even then, I haven't seen much if any difference. Obviously, no studies on that scenario.@Meetketchup this is "targeted fat" related so I am curious about your thoughts on fasted cardio vs. fed cardio. Depending on which article you read, the narratives are completely opposite. I find there to be truth on both sides, but I tend to lean towards the side of "doesn't really matter" because ultimately, fat loss is dependent upon a caloric average over time. I could be entirely wrong based upon glycogen and cortisol effects, but when I hear "fasted cardio" my brain interprets this as the equivalent of saying:
It will cost me more money if I grocery shop before I deposit my check rather than going after I deposit my check.
Money comes out, money goes in. Same money, regardless of the order. Again, curious about your thoughts and if I'm missing something.
As it is, I have a hard enough time finding the motivation to do it daily. Most days I just have to do it out of pure damn stubbornness. Getting a machine at home has helped because now I can go the second I feel like it because the next second may change my mind. If I had to include fasted or fed into the motivation equation, I'd probably never do it. Like you said, I just have to do the damn cardio.Correct. There is no significant difference "net" wise (at the end of the day) between fasted and fed cardio. This has been shown time and time again via studies and in real life. The only argument I see that may have some relevance is if you are super lean and using clen/ephedrine/yohimbe fasted, but even then, I haven't seen much if any difference. Obviously, no studies on that scenario.
People will swear one way or the other but it's preference. Just do your damn cardio.
The equation is the same, deficit calories means weight loss. The difference between fasted and fed is really negligible and I think it really aligns with when you train. If you work out at 5am it is probably easier to do it in a fasted state. As far as localization of fat loss no specific exercise or movement will target a single area. I have heard promising results from tesamorelin hitting targeted fat as that is what it is used for with HIV patients getting that Ethiopian belly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agree on the cardio piece.
The tesa thing likely won’t work for gen pop. It’s sometimes used in HIV patients that have lipodystrophy (where they can get fat around their internal organs mostly as a result of the older treatments that were physiologically pretty harsh and could also cause disregulated endogenous GH production). GH would likely work better for genpop. Tesa is used in HIV as it is less likely to disrupt the normal axes and is more about getting back to normal endogenous gh production. So it’s the lack of normal gh function that it rescues and that helps with the visceral fat in HIV.
For someone with a normal axis (most of us until we mess them up), gh would still work for overall fat loss. Tesa gets you back to baseline or a bit better, but if you don’t have a problem and want to overdrive the gh/igf-1 pathway, just take some gh. Cuz if you don’t have a GH problem, your belly fat is just normal fat and won’t be selectively rescued as in HIV patients.
Sorry if that’s a bit rambling… and apologies to anyone selling tesa lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

