On their it looks like about an 8 day half life. Similar to test c.![]()
Steroid Plotter - The Web's #1 Steroid Cycle Planner
SteroidPlotter is the leading steroid cycle planner on the Web. Plot graphs and calculate levels for Anabolic Steroids (Testosterone, Nandrolone and more), TRT & Peptides based on dosage & half-life.steroidplotter.com
It has both Equipoise and Bold Cyp as an option.
@Meetketchup what are your thoughts on Bold Cyp vs EQ? From a shorter ester perspective.Reports are all over the place, but the best info I’ve ever seen on it was around two weeks or slightly more.
I would use EQ personally.@Meetketchup what are your thoughts on Bold Cyp vs EQ? From a shorter ester perspective.
If I wind up trying it I'll probably switch to EQ after dialing in a dosage. But at two weeks I don't know it makes that much of a difference. Doing something similar with NPP now. Once I run out. I'll do a test run with Deca. Cheaper more readily available. Just wanted to be able to pull NPP it I didn't agree with Nandrolone. But, so far loving it.I would use EQ personally.
@Meetketchup what are your thoughts on Bold Cyp vs EQ? From a shorter ester perspective.
Are there big differences in effects? Or is EQ just easier and more reliable to get? I'm open to either. I'm E2 sensitive, high and low. So the shorter ester of Bold Cyp was appealing. I was looking at either for E2 control on future cycles.No question EQ over bold Cyp.
You are overthinking things to the "Nth" degree. I can't recall one person running Bold Cyp or EQ in the last few years.Are there big differences in effects? Or is EQ just easier and more reliable to get? I'm open to either. I'm E2 sensitive, high and low. So the shorter ester of Bold Cyp was appealing. I was looking at either for E2 control on future cycles.
That's cool. But why EQ over Cyp. I've seen you're knowledgeable. If you recommended EQ over Bold Cyp, I'm sure you had a reason. Care to share?You are overthinking things to the "Nth" degree. I can't recall one person running Bold Cyp or EQ in the last few years.
Are there big differences in effects? Or is EQ just easier and more reliable to get? I'm open to either. I'm E2 sensitive, high and low. So the shorter ester of Bold Cyp was appealing. I was looking at either for E2 control on future cycles.

