Yes sir but look at the asterik and then read "about the data". The provisional data, the link I posted, is the actually breakdown, specific data, not broad. They clearly are using "broad" data to try and make it appear worse then it is. Zero way you can say "probable" when pneumonia and the flu have similar symptoms. Meanwhile the Flu has mysteriously disappeared only it has not. They are counting all numbers, and that is not an accurate representation. Not only that but we know a ton of tests were contaminated, etc. I will post a story below to show you one, where a goat, and a piece of fruit also tested positive. LOL.
Confirmed & Probable Cases
As of April 14, 2020, CDC case counts and death counts include both confirmed and probable cases and deaths. This change was made to reflect an
interim COVID-19 position statement pdf iconexternal iconissued by the Council for State and Territorial Epidemiologists on April 5, 2020. The position statement included a case definition and made COVID-19 a nationally notifiable disease.
When your president has a PhD (honorary but still) and secretly submits a goat, sheep, and piece of fruit for testing and they come back positive
...”The president said he had instructed Tanzanian security forces to check the quality of the kits. They had randomly obtained several non-human samples, including from a pawpaw (fruit), a goat and a sheep, but had assigned them human names and ages. Samples from the pawpaw and the goat tested positive for COVID-19, the president said, adding this meant it was likely that some people were being tested positive when in fact they were not infected by the coronavirus.”
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...7sjRxn44wAK1KPWNOuCcK_67W6PAVCfImajmrfObQLltQ