Maybe I should just stick to our email convo with all my questions moving forward lol. That was what I kind of expected though, as seemed only logical. Which was why I didn’t reply for awhile. Wanted to see others thoughts were because below.
Seemed more likely than not. If it was contaminated raws, I would have assumed more of a complete dog shit test like we had seen from other sources. Something like 100mg/ml NPP, 38.6mg/ml test p, 69mg/ml test c.
I do appreciate the thorough response though brother. As others said, you don’t brew, so it wouldn’t be on you regardless. I was only asking. I have some of your ment that went on sale and honestly grabbed just hoping not to get screwed and it tested solid. So wasn’t throwing shade. Was more of a debatable question I was asking. Not a jab question. To be fair, I’d rather see a test like this, than a test with random shit at whatever the fuck mg per ml randomly.
Not for one second that I think anyone was throwing shade, we are all grown men and we have thick skin.
These test results, I seen them before they were even posted, and to the original poster I told him from day one that transparency comes first and to always post results.
Their results that I've posted that were subpar, But the fact of the matter is people need to know what they're putting in their bodies.
The truth is most people are understandable, long as they know what something is, they're fine, this includes myself. And just like anybody else, same applies for myself, I hate surprises as well.
What we need to do collectively as a community is keep everyone informed on what's going on, and it's not so hard for sponsors to even hold themselves accountable and do sample testing.
We have a lot more samples, and we will continuously be doing sample testing.
Like you said, we can't be there to supervise, and I've emphasized that numerous times with other labs as well.
Brother, we're all good man, these are conversations that we should all be participating in..
