Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation
  • Already a member? Click here to login
  • 💪 Hello, please SIGN-UP FOR A FREE account and become a member of our community!
    You will then be able to start threads, post comments and send messages to other members. Thanks!
  • 🚨Muscle Gelz HEAL - A Topical Peptide Repair Formula with BPC-157 & TB-500!🚨

PSL NPP Jano Result

Thank you for posting these results!!! ☺️☺️
 
I hate to be that guy, as the NPP is clearly dosed dead on. But the “trace compounds”? Reusing filters or what’s the thoughts on that?
 
JMT26 said:
I hate to be that guy, as the NPP is clearly dosed dead on. But the “trace compounds”? Reusing filters or what’s the thoughts on that?
Click to expand...
How these tests actually work, they need more samples to actually generate a true reading with the ratios.

For an example, if someone sent in only three tablets/pills, it may generate a number on point, if someone sends in 10 tablets, they will fluctuate in either direction and the results may be different, it may be higher, or the overall maybe lower...

But sending in one sample is good enough, but if people want dead balls accurate readings, People can ask for multiple samples to be tested from different bottles, furthermore sending and samples to two different facilities, results will vary, that doesn't mean it's a good thing or bad thing.
 
Vision said:
For an example, if someone sent in only three tablets/pills, it may generate a number on point, if someone sends in 10 tablets, they will fluctuate in either direction and the results may be different, it may be higher, or the overall maybe lower...
Click to expand...
Okay but you’re not answering the question. That has nothing to do with other compounds? I’m not even saying it’s a bit deal, but you’re not addressing what he said.
 
Vision said:
For an example, if someone sent in only three tablets/pills, it may generate a number on point, if someone sends in 10 tablets, they will fluctuate in either direction and the results may be different, it may be higher, or the overall maybe lower...
Click to expand...
He’s not talking about a variance in mg amounts. I think we can understand a minor variance there for sure.
 
KellogCrush said:
Okay but you’re not answering the question. That has nothing to do with other compounds? I’m not even saying it’s a bit deal, but you’re not addressing what he said.
Click to expand...
Alright, let's set the record straight, because apparently, understanding dosages is akin to mastering quantum physics. There's this wild notion that dosages are always spot-on. Spoiler alert: they're about as reliable as a weather forecast. More samples and testing reveal that nailing the perfect dosage is like hitting a bullseye while blindfolded. The results? Oh, they're just a delight. My little contribution here is purely for educational purposes, not to brag about some mythical perfection. I'm just highlighting the unpredictable nature of testing, which can swing like a pendulum.

Now, about those trace compounds—oops, totally glossed over that part. My bad. Figuring out how any traces of the raw material even showed up is like searching for a needle in a haystack.

And the theory that this all came from the filtration process? Please. There's as much evidence for that as there is for Bigfoot. Cross-contamination at the raw material outsourcing facility? Now there's a theory with some meat on its bones.
KellogCrush said:
He’s not talking about a variance in mg amounts. I think we can understand a minor variance there for sure.
Click to expand...
Just to clarify, my earlier response wasn't crafted just for your singular, illustrious self. It's for all those silent observers, readers, and, of course, my dear friends So everyone who doesn't fully understand, can now have a keen understanding.. So, brace yourself, because I'm going to continue sharing whatever nuggets of wisdom I deem fit on this topic. Understand, furthermore I'll address things on my own terms, in my own order. Do we have an understanding?

Apparently, there's a shocking number of people who haven't quite grasped the testing procedures. If that's all right with you, I'll just keep doing my thing. Are we on the same page, or do I need to draw a diagram, because I have the paper and crayons right here next to me?
 

Latest threads

Back
Top