• 💪 Hello, please SIGN-UP FOR A FREE account and become a member of our community!
    You will then be able to start threads, post comments and send messages to other members. Thanks!
  • 🔥 Kits4Less.com #1 MOST LAB-TESTED SOURCE — 25% OFF YOUR FIRST ORDER! 🔥

CoronaVirus Vaccine

Will you voluntarily take the CoronaVirus vaccine

  • Absolutely!

    Votes: 24 21.1%

  • Hell no!

    Votes: 74 64.9%

  • Unsure

    Votes: 16 14.0%
  • Total voters
    114
A new analysis of studies in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) flagship scientific journal found the agency promoted the effectiveness of masks using unreliable data with conclusions unsupported by evidence.

The preprint, published July 11 on MedRxiv, found the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) made positive findings about the efficacy of masks 75 percent of the time, despite only 30 percent of studies testing masks, and less than 15 percent having “statistically significant results.”


No studies were randomized, yet the CDC in over half of their MMWR studies, made misleading statements indicating a causal relationship between mask-wearing and a decrease in COVID-19 cases or transmission, despite failing to show evidence of mask effectiveness.

www.medrxiv.org

An analysis of studies pertaining to masks in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Characteristics and quality of all studies from 1978 to 2023

Importance: Because the MMWR has substantial influence on United States public health policy and is not externally peer-reviewed, it is critical to understand the scientific process within the journal. Mask policies during COVID is one topic that has been highly influenced by data published in...
www.medrxiv.org www.medrxiv.org
 
heavyiron said:
NEW - Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese."

www.nationalreview.com

RFK Jr. Argues Covid-19 May Have Been Engineered to Attack ‘Caucasian and Black People’ | National Review

‘The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese,’ the Democratic presidential hopeful added.
www.nationalreview.com www.nationalreview.com
Click to expand...
Oh boy.

I predict an assassination attempt in the near future. Yikes 😬

Not suppoda talk about certain things … our overlords won’t let this slide.
 
We've known this all along.

He deserves the death penalty. Once found guilty of course.Screenshot_20230715-103752-536.png
 
GYMnTONIC said:
We've known this all along.

He deserves the death penalty. Once found guilty of course.View attachment 96984
Click to expand...
I'd prefer his entire family line stopped. Aunts uncles cousins sisters u name it. I want em gone .public execution

I'd prefer they go the way one of my ancestors went... it was far more gruesome if u read into it
9ea1b9b97bc4a4a9e06591eb87505b6e.jpg


Sent from my SM-A526U1 using Tapatalk
 
heavyiron said:
I already read one publication saying he is antisemitic for communicating the data.
Click to expand...
At this point the humanity machine works that way. The antisemitic trope comes out automatically. I don't even know if the selectivity is even true. I have not seen the data but from what I know of it, it only considers the levels of ACE II receptor. There are 5 receptors for SARS CoV 2 spike: ACEII, CD147, L-SIGN and DC-SIGN. Plus the receptor is not the only pathogenic factor of the spike protein. I specifically know Chinese that had horrific side effects from the vaccine. I know Jews as well that had side effects. Israel was not spared side effects at all. It was massive there. I don't know the breakdown but many many Jews in Israel have Ashkenazi heritage. the Israeli medical establishment and it's media suppressed the information just like the rest of the Western nations. This whole thing has been a travesty.
 
Glycomann said:
At this point the humanity machine works that way. The antisemitic trope comes out automatically. I don't even know if the selectivity is even true. I have not seen the data but from what I know of it, it only considers the levels of ACE II receptor. There are 5 receptors for SARS CoV 2 spike: ACEII, CD147, L-SIGN and DC-SIGN. Plus the receptor is not the only pathogenic factor of the spike protein. I specifically know Chinese that had horrific side effects from the vaccine. I know Jews as well that had side effects. Israel was not spared side effects at all. It was massive there. I don't know the breakdown but many many Jews in Israel have Ashkenazi heritage. the Israeli medical establishment and it's media suppressed the information just like the rest of the Western nations. This whole thing has been a travesty.
Click to expand...
How do they determine your level of jewyness? Jewishry?

Covid 19 was started in like 1965 I posted a link in here from Twitter . Def worth a watch ..I'm helping a conspiracy theorist on Twitter connect the dots

Sent from my SM-A526U1 using Tapatalk
 
Glycomann said:
At this point the humanity machine works that way. The antisemitic trope comes out automatically. I don't even know if the selectivity is even true. I have not seen the data but from what I know of it, it only considers the levels of ACE II receptor. There are 5 receptors for SARS CoV 2 spike: ACEII, CD147, L-SIGN and DC-SIGN. Plus the receptor is not the only pathogenic factor of the spike protein. I specifically know Chinese that had horrific side effects from the vaccine. I know Jews as well that had side effects. Israel was not spared side effects at all. It was massive there. I don't know the breakdown but many many Jews in Israel have Ashkenazi heritage. the Israeli medical establishment and it's media suppressed the information just like the rest of the Western nations. This whole thing has been a travesty.
Click to expand...
Same here, I keep hearing this theory being raised and I have for years but so far I have not seen all the data. He did mention the ace2 receptor.

I guess its time to go on this rabbit trail =)
 
GYMnTONIC said:
View attachment 97085
Click to expand...

Crazy times we are living in. I think the slip of the tongue by Harris was the real goal, population reduction has been a goal of the elites for ever. Bring in a government dependent lower class to replace a dying, literally and figuratively, middle class to support infrastructure and their power will never be challenged. That is why Trump is so hated, he didn’t play along. If he wins by some wild chance expect a JFK moment. The clot shot was probably just the tip to test the waters of compliance. Think of how many people chose to take an experimental vaccine simply so they could continue working at a job they hated to provide a life for those they loved. I pray to God every day that he turns their evil ways on them and protection from the harm they are plotting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
GYMnTONIC said:
Friendly Poll...

Will you voluntarily take the vaccine?
Yes or No?
Click to expand...
That would be a no, I haven't been vaccinated against corona virus and I have never gotten sick and I have been around sick people, even got sneezed on. I have a healthy immune system and I don't take any flu yearly vaccines. I got some when I was born, I had no say about those, but these days I will not vaccinate myself against crap that is pushed by big pharma.
 
Warchild said:
Crazy times we are living in. I think the slip of the tongue by Harris was the real goal, population reduction has been a goal of the elites for ever. Bring in a government dependent lower class to replace a dying, literally and figuratively, middle class to support infrastructure and their power will never be challenged. That is why Trump is so hated, he didn’t play along. If he wins by some wild chance expect a JFK moment. The clot shot was probably just the tip to test the waters of compliance. Think of how many people chose to take an experimental vaccine simply so they could continue working at a job they hated to provide a life for those they loved. I pray to God every day that he turns their evil ways on them and protection from the harm they are plotting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I returned to church recently. i did so for my granddaughter. She needs to be babtized and I want her to be raised with a good moral compass. I'm not sure how long I'll stay at this church. Frankly I am disappointed in the Roman Catholic Church. The Apostle's Creed has been changed to the point where "born of the virgin Mary and became man" has been removes. They also removed phrases where God is male. The sermons and the readings from the Gospel are treated very surface. There is no delving into the meaning of the readings. It would leave me feeling pretty empty if I don't dig deeper or have some understanding of scrpture from interactions with Greek Orthodox and others that think a little more deeply. Thankfully, we all have a spark of devinity and can think. The more I attend church the more woke they appear and the less adherence to doctrine I see.
 

The Fact-Check Racket Finally Unravels​

written by jeffrey a. tucker

undefined


Before the COVID lockdowns, social media companies had started contracting with new third-parties organizations called fact-checkers to assist in “content creation.” Getting a pass meant the post or story was amplified but getting dinged for inaccuracy meant that the post would be throttled or deleted.

For a while we believed it but certain revelations changed that. We came to realize that the posts labeled false were typically contrary to regime narratives. And a close look at the supposed refutation revealed that many points were very much in dispute. The companies developed a talent for seeming to reveal something false that was actually still debatable and interesting to consider. In most cases, what was declared false was still under consideration.

As time went on, the attempts to censor became more brazen and obvious. Then the Twitter files and other FOIAs generated proof of what many suspected all along. These entities were funded either directly or indirectly by government or by other dark-money sources as quid pro quos for other relationships they had cultivated with interested parties.

In other words, they were not some independent, science-based entities at all but rather hit squads with a hard political agenda. What was actually happening here was a form of censorship laundering. Government wants to censor but cannot so it turns to the social-media company to do the dirty work. To make this hand-in-glove racket less obvious, the companies would outsource to a fact-checking organization, making the lines of control even more blurry.

Sometime within the last several months, the whole racket seems to have unraveled. I rarely see the fact-checks cited at all. Or maybe they are cited ironically: what is declared false came to be seen as a badge of honor, a confirmation of core truth. That might seem crazy but these are the times in which we live. Nothing is as it seems.

At any one time, Brownstone and The Epoch Times deal with a range of ongoing fact-checks, some of which result in a hit piece but others just go away for no apparent reason. I’m coming to realize that the harassing emails themselves serve a purpose. They are designed to scare publishers and chill free speech. Risk-averse managers might be inclined not to run with a story rather than be put through the ringer and deal with possible reputation hits.

It’s all become ridiculously predictable.

Three days ago, a data maven who writes for Brownstone revealed a first look at some numbers he had been crunching over the CDC’s listing of COVID as cause of death. He initially sent the results to a private email list and I suggested we go with what he had discovered as an initial look.

He had death certificates from Missouri and Massachusetts and was able to cross-check them with the same once they got into the hands of the CDC. He found thousands of instances in which COVID was not listed as cause of death in the coroner’s report but it was added directly by the CDC. The scale of the problem is vast. The implications of this are rather ominous. We’ve been relying on CDC data for three-plus years to understand the scope of COVID’s mortality.

“The worst pandemic in 100 years,” they kept saying, and that might be true. But obviously the claim is highly contingent on correctly marking the cause-of-death codes. What Aaron Hertzberg found is that the CDC was changing the code to inflate the numbers. By how much it is hard to say but based on the data so far, this is a very serious problem with awesome implications for how we understand what happened to us.

The immediate question concerns the decision-making at the CDC. We know that Deborah Birx, coronavirus task force coordinator, said from the podium that they would mark every death with COVID as being from COVID. That was in the spring of 2020 and had already set off alarm bells. Changing the cause of death to COVID from something else is next-level crazy.

Under whose authority did the CDC act? Birx was not in charge of the CDC. Indeed, her power and status was always unclear. No question that she came to the White House by recommendation of Matthew Pottinger of the National Security Council. Also we know for certain that from March 13, 2020, onward, the NSC was the lead agency with the CDC reduced to operations. If the CDC had faced some formal order to mark COVID as cause of death regardless of what state certificates said, no one has ever seen such an order.

The implications of all of this are rather ominous. And keep in mind that this discovery was not made by a whistleblower or a specialist in this field but an obsessive data maven from the citizen world who has a passion to get to the truth. If he is right, the documentation here implies a level of treachery that even I had not considered.

I saw two reactions to the article once published. The most common reaction was that this is nothing new. Everyone knew this was happening the whole time. We saw the death numbers go up and up from COVID and equally down for every other cause. It was pretty clear that there was something fishy going on. So some people said that there is nothing surprising here. The CDC is capable of any degree of malfeasance.

The other reaction was flat-out denial and accusing Brownstone and the author of simply making things up. Indeed, many people were outraged that we could or would ever suggest that the CDC was anything other than truth-telling.

Watching all of this unfold, I began awaiting the arrival of the inevitable intimidating emails from fact-check organizations. Sure enough, they did arrive. They came to the author, to other scholars, to me personally, and everyone else. It was a true blitzkrieg. Maybe there was a time when I would have stopped my day and become defensive and answered them all, getting more data from the author and so on, and then worrying about the fallout. But this is not my first rodeo. At this point, it was easy to brush off all this drama as completely manufactured and fake. That’s exactly what I did.

To be sure, if the author made mistakes, they should be corrected. I’m sure the author would be the first to do so. This kind of research is lonely and he would welcome others to join in his efforts. That’s how science works: a community shares data and strives to get closer to the truth. But that’s not what fact-checks are about. They start with the presumption that they know the truth and you do not, and then schoolmarm you to the point that you admit them to be correct.

Here’s what I’ve concluded. Fact-check false really means: likely true but not what you are allowed to believe.

A final footnote here. A major claim of the fact-checkers for more than three years is that it is a conspiracy theory and false that the Wuhan lab conducted gain-of-function research and that the virus was a result of that research and a likely leak. Fauci dismissed this for a very long time, and fact-checkers frequently cited him and said the claim was false.

As a result of the Republican takeover of Congress, we’ve gained more access to the fullness of what was going on in those days. A committee has released an unredacted email dated Feb. 1, 2020, in which Fauci says that Wuhan was engaged in gain-of-function and that this virus might be the result.

At this point, it’s reasonable to assume that nearly every official source on the virus was wrong or lying for years now. You probably know this. In any case, my intuition here is that we are only at the beginning of discovery of the fullness of the duplicity. The stakes are very high: American liberty suffered a grave blow during the COVID response. If the reason wasn’t the virus, what was it then?
 
My overall thoughts on the reason the scamdemic was so successful is that people want to follow. This is why they are so into propping up political figures, jumping on the bandwagon. Also the worship of celebrities and sports figures.
People also want to belong to something. That’s why there are so many clubs and organizations. In the case of the scamdemic, look at how many people risked their lives by standing in a massive line of people who thought they had covid just to get tested so they could tell everyone that they had covid. Even now, if someone gets a little off, they do an at home covid test and tell all their friends.
The whole thing was mass hysteria/mob mentality from masking to the jab and everything surrounding it.

Most of us who avoided the vax did so because of free, analytical thinking. Not some conspiracy leaning group/gang effect.
 
Glycomann said:
I returned to church recently. i did so for my granddaughter. She needs to be babtized and I want her to be raised with a good moral compass. I'm not sure how long I'll stay at this church. Frankly I am disappointed in the Roman Catholic Church. The Apostle's Creed has been changed to the point where "born of the virgin Mary and became man" has been removes. They also removed phrases where God is male. The sermons and the readings from the Gospel are treated very surface. There is no delving into the meaning of the readings. It would leave me feeling pretty empty if I don't dig deeper or have some understanding of scrpture from interactions with Greek Orthodox and others that think a little more deeply. Thankfully, we all have a spark of devinity and can think. The more I attend church the more woke they appear and the less adherence to doctrine I see.
Click to expand...

I was originally Catholic and left the church because I didn’t agree with so much in regard to the administration running it, I think they are evil and corrupt. My local church is a southern Baptist and they give the sermon directly from the Bible. It has really had a significant impact on my emotional health and the togetherness of my family. I hope you find your spot and will pray that you do.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Fletcher said:
Anyone remember the videos of people who were getting the "connect to Astra-Zeneca?" message pop-up on smart tvs after getting jabbed?
Click to expand...
I remember that . Most of the shots have graphene and squalene.
I've heard rumors ( I don't go out much )
That if you were to take a vaccinated person's blood and put it in a slide glass for microscope you can separate the graphene using magnets.

The squalene makes it impossible for your body to heal as it damages your dna .

I've also seen that pills with " dyed letters " may contain graphene. You let your pill dissolve in a cup of water and have a magnet on the outside of the cup and you'll see tiny black dots that move with the magnet

I am currently banned on Twitter for posting bill gates information and George soros

I will download Twitter again tomorrow and see if I'm still banned.

I'm banned on fb , tumblr , sometimes Google works for me . Sometimes I have to use my other phone on public wifi

Sent from my SM-A526U1 using Tapatalk
 
Have we all gotten out boosters yet??
Winter will be here soon.
Who's with me?
 
Pretty much those that didn't get the shots will recieve the shots through their food . They are injecting cows chicken and pigs

If your wife or gf had the shot it would be passed through breast milk to the baby

In men the shot actually makes you sterile . It's like a sperm killer.
In women it raises chances of still born , cancer rates , birth defects all sorts of bad shit

Anyone that got them shots has a life expectancy of 3-7 years . If you don't die suddenly

Anyone that survives past 3-7 years and has a child will have super cancers .

They want the super cancers for space travel. No one can withstand the amount of radiation in space for years except for someone with cancer.

The hope for cancer is you'll revert back to your human self with all the radiation

The radiation and cancer will make aliens of us. God only made humans not aliens so just by surviving your an abomination. You're no longer human because it permanent changed your dna

If you share a bed with someone who had the shots it can leech into you

It's a self replicating nano bot that will replicate your blood stream and force your blood out.

It's to create the tree of knowledge .
All "humans "will have the knowledge of the entire universe ( mocking God ) as God is knowledge

This will bring forth something like the matrix where humans are harvested and bred for power to power the machines




Sent from my SM-A526U1 using Tapatalk
 
Warchild said:
I was originally Catholic and left the church because I didn’t agree with so much in regard to the administration running it, I think they are evil and corrupt. My local church is a southern Baptist and they give the sermon directly from the Bible. It has really had a significant impact on my emotional health and the togetherness of my family. I hope you find your spot and will pray that you do.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Thank you. Yes, they are corrupt.
 

Latest threads

Back
Top