Idk about titrating up the EQ. My thought is start with a little more aggressive ratio and up the test if needed instead, starting with some prop so it hits right away. I used this on my last cycle and it worked pretty well. 500t/400eq put my e2 in the teens. 600/400 put me in the 30s. EQ is such a long ester that it made more sense to me this way.Ran almost the same last winter. test 525, EQ 210, NPP 250. At 525:210 my E2 was 24-26 with no other AI. Usually 500+ would put me closer to 100 for E2, so you might want to start even lower and titrate up. Or just send it lol - just be sure to check and watch for crashed E2. Having crashed it once before, I do NOT want to repeat those symptoms! Cycle was great though - worked very well for me
Ran almost the same last winter. test 525, EQ 210, NPP 250. At 525:210 my E2 was 24-26 with no other AI. Usually 500+ would put me closer to 100 for E2, so you might want to start even lower and titrate up. Or just send it lol - just be sure to check and watch for crashed E2. Having crashed it once before, I do NOT want to repeat those symptoms! Cycle was great though - worked very well for me
I wouldn't recommend titrating EQ. You'll be constantly trying to dial in estrogen throughout the cycle.

Definitely a compound to start low on and see what it does, also very dependent on the data one already has on their body. I'm the outlier with incredibly high e2 who needs to run it 2:1 with Test to keep e2 in check and have no need for ai. Yep 300 Test = 600 EQ. Currently Test and EQ are 1:1 as I just don't want to run a boatload of gear, 400 Primo on top and need Arimidex. lolYeah, especially if you’ve run it before. But if it’s the first time it’s kind of a crapshoot to know how it’ll affect you. I started my cycle, waited 8 weeks for steady state and tested so I had a good idea of where I landed. Was almost bummed at how much it reduced my E2, as I’d have like to run it a bit higher. But it is what it is and the NPP covered the difference (and the lowered E2 made the NPP easy to run with no sides). But if I’d run it say equal doses I’d have had to up my test to a gram and added dbol lol
Wait a minute - that would have been fan-fuckin-tastic!
I also am someone who doesn’t feel good at all with low E2 - like it’s terrible for me - so maybe I’m predisposed to have been conservative with the first time I ran EQ. If you’re not as sensitive to low E2 then titrating over many weeks (and maybe even needing to do a second cycle to fully suss out how EQ affects you) prolly doesn’t make sense
I’m also older, so probably can’t get away with as much! lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is close to my targetNgl I LOVEEE npp, and EQ together. I ran 750 test, 400 npp and 350 EQ, 6 iu growth. Best cycle I’ve ever ran. 20 weeks of this and bloods were as best as they could be. I tolerate bigger doses pretty well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
IYO what is a "high dose"A decade ago we would all run Test, Deca and EQ in our bulks....
Joints never ached no matter how heavy we pushed.
I never seen a decrease in E2 off from EQ but I also ran it much higher
than most on here run it.... Still for EQ to REALLY shine, you have to run larger doses for longer periods of time.
If your not a vascular guy, EQ will make you very very vascular.

