Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation
  • Already a member? Click here to login
  • 💪 Hello, please SIGN-UP FOR A FREE account and become a member of our community!
    You will then be able to start threads, post comments and send messages to other members. Thanks!
  • 🚨Muscle Gelz HEAL - A Topical Peptide Repair Formula with BPC-157 & TB-500!🚨

Relationship Between Testosterone Ester and E2 Levels

codem

SunrisePharma Customer
Registered
Joined
Sep 12, 2025
Messages
416
Reaction score
323
Points
71
Is there a relationship of the ester being used vs the amount of aromatization?

For example, is it possible for an individual to aromatize more from 500mg of Test Cypionate vs 500mg of Test Enanthate?
 
Yes and no

Certaain esters don’t aromatise more than others, but the esters change how fast the compound releases or peaks in the system, so test no ester or test prop would obviously hit much faster (and cause quicker aromatization) due to a faster peak than say test Undecanoate which would release slower and have a more gradual peak curve.

Then there’s the case of ester weights. Testosterone propionate ester weights about 20.4%, so you’re getting about 79.6% of the testosterone dosage after factoring ester weight where testosterone Undecanoate ester weighs 39%, so you’re getting 61% of the testosterone dosage after accounting for ester.

So tldr: the shorter the ester the most testosterone you’re actually getting because the longer ester weigh more. And shorter esters peak harder and faster than longer esters

So the esters themselves don’t actually cause more or less aromatization but there’s indirect mechanics where you’re getting more or less testosterone which could yield a higher aromatization level with shorter esters

To your example —cyp vs E : the esters are extremely close in half life and weight where any aromatization difference is probably negligible
 

Latest threads

Back
Top