• 💪 Hello, please SIGN-UP FOR A FREE account and become a member of our community!
    You will then be able to start threads, post comments and send messages to other members. Thanks!
  • 🚨Muscle Gelz HEAL - A Topical Peptide Repair Formula with BPC-157 & TB-500!🚨

Masteron / Dr Todd Lee

RaiderStrong

Registered
Joined
May 15, 2025
Messages
39
Reaction score
14
Points
16
Are you guys on board with Todd Lee logic that you take as much test as you can handle and then up the anabolic load with tons of Masteron?

He’s big on Masteron over primo and I like it bc primo is bad on the wallet.
 
I love Mast, but most people will tell you that they don’t add much mass when running it. Todd has said himself that he made the most gains running Nandrolone only cycles. It’s in the comments section in one of his YT vids. I asked him. I’m certain you can maintain a large amount of mass running some test/Mast, but not sure you can build a monster physique with it. That being said, John Jewett claims he only runs test/mast/primo and he’s a big dude.
 
I love Mast, but most people will tell you that they don’t add much mass when running it. Todd has said himself that he made the most gains running Nandrolone only cycles. It’s in the comments section in one of his YT vids. I asked him. I’m certain you can maintain a large amount of mass running some test/Mast, but not sure you can build a monster physique with it. That being said, John Jewett claims he only runs test/mast/primo and he’s a big dude.
I agree that nandrolone has given me the best gains. I love Deca.
 
As long as they aren’t blends. 🤦‍♂️
oj simpson night GIF
 
Are you guys on board with Todd Lee logic that you take as much test as you can handle and then up the anabolic load with tons of Masteron?

He’s big on Masteron over primo and I like it bc primo is bad on the wallet.
If you want an ai then use eq. Mast isn't an ai I dint know why he keeps comparing the two. His logic is that you shouldn't be using beyond trt doses if you have to control your e2 with drugs. Yeah this bodybuilding not hormone replacement. If you want to grow you need test, and the more you up your test the more you need to be aware of e2 levels. His logic here is beyond stupid.
 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
If you want an ai then use eq. Mast isn't an ai I dint know why he keeps comparing the two. His logic is that you shouldn't be using beyond trt doses if you have to control your e2 with drugs. Yeah this bodybuilding not hormone replacement. If you want to grow you need test, and the more you up your test the more you need to be aware of e2 levels. His logic here is beyond stupid.

Numerous times he's stated Primo and EQ are more interchangeable than Primo and Mast.
 
If you want an ai then use eq. Mast isn't an ai I dint know why he keeps comparing the two. His logic is that you shouldn't be using beyond trt doses if you have to control your e2 with drugs. Yeah this bodybuilding not hormone replacement. If you want to grow you need test, and the more you up your test the more you need to be aware of e2 levels. His logic here is beyond stupid.
And the more you up your test, the more you grow provided everything else is in line. I don’t agree with Todd on the Mast thing either. Mast may be anabolic, but nowhere near as much as test. You’d be better off running higher test and save the Mast for something else if adding size is your goal.
 
If I am not mistaken John Jewitt preaches this method to some degree as well. Test as high as you can go without side effects and then use mast OR primo to up your total anabolic number.

Some say mast makes you flat. For me if my food is high, carbs especially I don’t really feel this. I can’t attest to primo instead of mast bc I haven’t used primo. To me it’s just not worth it to spend twice the amount over mast.

What’s your guys opinion on mast vs primo?
 
If I am not mistaken John Jewitt preaches this method to some degree as well. Test as high as you can go without side effects and then use mast OR primo to up your total anabolic number.

Some say mast makes you flat. For me if my food is high, carbs especially I don’t really feel this. I can’t attest to primo instead of mast bc I haven’t used primo. To me it’s just not worth it to spend twice the amount over mast.

What’s your guys opinion on mast vs primo?
John, in regard to Primo and Mast, speaks that aside from the E2 reducing aspect of primo will yield very similar results across the board as Mast, which I've seen for years in myself and clients. In fact, in a calorie surplus most people wouldn't know the difference if you didn't tell them which one was being injected. Run both, see which one you like better. Simple as that and don't over complicate things.
 
John, in regard to Primo and Mast, speaks that aside from the E2 reducing aspect of primo will yield very similar results across the board as Mast, which I've seen for years in myself and clients. In fact, in a calorie surplus most people wouldn't know the difference if you didn't tell them which one was being injected. Run both, see which one you like better. Simple as that and don't over complicate things.
So basically spending double or more on primo over mast isn’t worth digging into your wallet for correct?

What about running test/mast/primo or should you just stick to one or the other.
 
So basically spending double or more on primo over mast isn’t worth digging into your wallet for correct?

What about running test/mast/primo or should you just stick to one or the other.
If money is an issue there isn't anything wrong with replacing Primo w/ Mast. Just manage your E2 if needed.

You could run a combo, but looking at the big picture will make little to difference in body comp/strength running both or one or the other.
 
Todd is an idiot. He says shit to get views and comments. Thats how he gets paid.
I gotta get me one of them there YouTube channel things on the interwebz. Maybe It'll be a gigolo channel that caters to grannies GILFs or even fat old women.
 
John, in regard to Primo and Mast, speaks that aside from the E2 reducing aspect of primo will yield very similar results across the board as Mast, which I've seen for years in myself and clients. In fact, in a calorie surplus most people wouldn't know the difference if you didn't tell them which one was being injected. Run both, see which one you like better. Simple as that and don't over complicate things.
I think it’s a solid and relatively safe strategy for the long term.
 
If I am not mistaken John Jewitt preaches this method to some degree as well. Test as high as you can go without side effects and then use mast OR primo to up your total anabolic number.

Some say mast makes you flat. For me if my food is high, carbs especially I don’t really feel this. I can’t attest to primo instead of mast bc I haven’t used primo. To me it’s just not worth it to spend twice the amount over mast.

What’s your guys opinion on mast vs primo?
Test as high as you can handle it is a lot different than saying you should only take 20mg a day and if your estrogen increases that means you're taking too much. lol.
 
John, in regard to Primo and Mast, speaks that aside from the E2 reducing aspect of primo will yield very similar results across the board as Mast, which I've seen for years in myself and clients. In fact, in a calorie surplus most people wouldn't know the difference if you didn't tell them which one was being injected. Run both, see which one you like better. Simple as that and don't over complicate things.
You've seen a similar e2 from mast? mg for mg? Generally curious on this one.
 
John, in regard to Primo and Mast, speaks that aside from the E2 reducing aspect of primo will yield very similar results across the board as Mast, which I've seen for years in myself and clients. In fact, in a calorie surplus most people wouldn't know the difference if you didn't tell them which one was being injected. Run both, see which one you like better. Simple as that and don't over complicate things.
@Meetketchup nevermind just reread this I'm dumb lol
 
Would someone be better off adding primo to a test/mast cycle or adding npp to a test/mast cycle?

Personally I can’t see the hype in overpriced primo but to each his own I guess?
 
Would someone be better off adding primo to a test/mast cycle or adding npp to a test/mast cycle?

Personally I can’t see the hype in overpriced primo but to each his own I guess?

Depends. If you are needing to regulate E2 primo would be a better option.
 
Are you guys on board with Todd Lee logic that you take as much test as you can handle and then up the anabolic load with tons of Masteron?

He’s big on Masteron over primo and I like it bc primo is bad on the wallet.
Mast is just a compound with minimal sides and doesn't effect estrogen, so it can be added to your hearts desire. Id say upping test and then using an AI whether that be a dedicated AI like asin or AI like AAS like Eq or primo are good too.

Tren blows all other steroids out of the water for longevity and potency tho. Some orals are more potent but they actually have to be limited to cycle lengths due to liver toxicity. Tren can be used for months, easily.

Sent from my SM-S938U1 using Tapatalk
 
I think Todd’s has a good approach to be honest. It just makes sense, just enough test to get your e2 where you want and Masteron to drive anabolic load, at the end of the day it’s not the Masteron itself doing the growing people get caught up on this it’s the trifecta of High anabolics aka more mgs of gear WITH GH and a proper e2 level for max systemic igf1 conversion where is where the whole enchilada culminates.

It does seem like the best approach when you’re looking at how to do it the “safest” which doesn’t translate to the most “effective” approach for growth, because he’s not 300lbs and the dudes who are run testosterone in the grams, plus other gear for “anabolic load” meaning more mgs and GH, but obviously there’s more shit to counter act going this route, but high test seems to be the way, when what Todd preaches is what he believes to be the safest way.
 
I think Todd’s has a good approach to be honest. It just makes sense, just enough test to get your e2 where you want and Masteron to drive anabolic load, at the end of the day it’s not the Masteron itself doing the growing people get caught up on this it’s the trifecta of High anabolics aka more mgs of gear WITH GH and a proper e2 level for max systemic igf1 conversion where is where the whole enchilada culminates.

It does seem like the best approach when you’re looking at how to do it the “safest” which doesn’t translate to the most “effective” approach for growth, because he’s not 300lbs and the dudes who are run testosterone in the grams, plus other gear for “anabolic load” meaning more mgs and GH, but obviously there’s more shit to counter act going this route, but high test seems to be the way, when what Todd preaches is what he believes to be the safest way.
I'm not convinced masteron is safer than a bio identical hormone like test. And he's literally out there telling people to only take 140mg of test a week but use a gram of mast a week. One could easily drive test up to 500mg take the mast out and would prob be safer and more effective.
 
I'm not convinced masteron is safer than a bio identical hormone like test. And he's literally out there telling people to only take 140mg of test a week but use a gram of mast a week. One could easily drive test up to 500mg take the mast out and would prob be safer and more effective.
I’m not convinced either because Masteron wrecks my prostate which he swears he’s never seen Masteron do that and it’s just a myth. I run 300mgs of mast and I pee every 15 minutes with half the pee squirting out after I done tucked my shit away which is clearly an enlarged prostate issue. As always it’s all individual, that’s why I never like telling people what drugs to use or how much, because everyone reacts differently, even training routines there’s movements machines that just work with my biomechanics that my gym partner may not feel crap on or just doesn’t work for him.

I need to lower my estrogen on only 300mg of test which puts me at 1500ng/dl tt, so again his protocol doesn’t work for me. I would need to use primo instead and drive it up as high as needed to where my e2 is in range and if I want more mgs then add Masteron. There’s others who can run a gram of test with zero ai.

There’s a synergy to high anabolics and GH, that’s where his logic comes from. Where the testosterone is just high enough to be high normal tt and e2 for max systemic igf1 which is not even the igf you want, but whatever And then run you the mgs up with what he believes to be the safest anabolic. The dude also claims Masteron has nothing to do with losing hair while having no hair 🤣

Every one I know who’s big asf ran testosterone high, with GH, so I believe that to be the most effective route, although for guys like myself who run into a bunch of issues at low dose test it’s not ideal, everything ain’t for everyone.

There’s also pretty big dudes that never abused anything, so there’s also that. So many variables, if you don’t plan on being 300lbs I don’t see why even risk experimenting with these level of cycles.
 
I’m not convinced either because Masteron wrecks my prostate which he swears he’s never seen Masteron do that and it’s just a myth. I run 300mgs of mast and I pee every 15 minutes with half the pee squirting out after I done tucked my shit away which is clearly an enlarged prostate issue. As always it’s all individual, that’s why I never like telling people what drugs to use or how much, because everyone reacts differently, even training routines there’s movements machines that just work with my biomechanics that my gym partner may not feel crap on or just doesn’t work for him.

I need to lower my estrogen on only 300mg of test which puts me at 1500ng/dl tt, so again his protocol doesn’t work for me. I would need to use primo instead and drive it up as high as needed to where my e2 is in range and if I want more mgs then add Masteron. There’s others who can run a gram of test with zero ai.

There’s a synergy to high anabolics and GH, that’s where his logic comes from. Where the testosterone is just high enough to be high normal tt and e2 for max systemic igf1 which is not even the igf you want, but whatever And then run you the mgs up with what he believes to be the safest anabolic. The dude also claims Masteron has nothing to do with losing hair while having no hair 🤣

Every one I know who’s big asf ran testosterone high, with GH, so I believe that to be the most effective route, although for guys like myself who run into a bunch of issues at low dose test it’s not ideal, everything ain’t for everyone.

There’s also pretty big dudes that never abused anything, so there’s also that. So many variables, if you don’t plan on being 300lbs I don’t see why even risk experimenting with these level of cycles.

Yeah I get the pee dripple too on Mast. I had never connected the two but that's probably the issue. And I ran Masteron for like two years straight because I was dumb and thought it was an AI, and now my hair is crowning. Have no idea if that's related, could just be anabolic use in general.

Either way he's telling people to only use 20mg of test every day and if you have an increase in e2 you're using too much. This is where I have an issue in his logic. If it was use 75mg-100mg a day and fill the rest with masteron that would be different. But at the same time, you need to maximize your e2 for igf-1 levels LOL, make up your mind bro which one is it.

There's also nothing wrong with controlling estrogen if you have to drive testosterone up. Like you said, everyone is different. I notice once I started using aromasin, primo, or eq my dick started working better and I have less water retention. I use to drive test really high without anything for my e2 and I thought I was fine, and my dick was always like a noodle half limp. I didn't even realize it was because I was letting my e2 go crazy. Running eq or primo at 70% of test works wonders regardless of test dosing. Even let's say if you are using a lower dose like 200mg, you could run primo or eq at 100mg. Now dick is hard and look leaner with less water and not moody.

I would even argue testosterone drives anabolism more than harsh steroids. And that's another problem with his logic, it's not about which steroid is the safest or harshest, it's the fact that test and gh are the drivers of anabolism because they are bio identical hormones.

That's why I'm so critical of his bs. Just usual youtube bs convincing teenagers you have it figured out to gain some cult like following. You can't reason with the guy either, try leaving a comment on his page and see what happens. The dude is like a child, definitely autistic or something going on there like ketchup has mentioned.

You get big with test and gh. His logic is all steroids are the same so mg for mg so just use the safest. Masteron isn't the same as testosterone and it's not safer than testosterone.
 
Mast is just a compound with minimal sides and doesn't effect estrogen, so it can be added to your hearts desire. Id say upping test and then using an AI whether that be a dedicated AI like asin or AI like AAS like Eq or primo are good too.

Tren blows all other steroids out of the water for longevity and potency tho. Some orals are more potent but they actually have to be limited to cycle lengths due to liver toxicity. Tren can be used for months, easily.

Sent from my SM-S938U1 using Tapatalk
I would not say tren can be used for months easily. for most people the side effects are pretty bad and even for those that don't seem to have them as badly, I have been round long enough to see a few of my good friends that just ran the shit out of tren blow out their heart or kidneys.
 
Yeah I get the pee dripple too on Mast. I had never connected the two but that's probably the issue. And I ran Masteron for like two years straight because I was dumb and thought it was an AI, and now my hair is crowning. Have no idea if that's related, could just be anabolic use in general.

Either way he's telling people to only use 20mg of test every day and if you have an increase in e2 you're using too much. This is where I have an issue in his logic. If it was use 75mg-100mg a day and fill the rest with masteron that would be different. But at the same time, you need to maximize your e2 for igf-1 levels LOL, make up your mind bro which one is it.

There's also nothing wrong with controlling estrogen if you have to drive testosterone up. Like you said, everyone is different. I notice once I started using aromasin, primo, or eq my dick started working better and I have less water retention. I use to drive test really high without anything for my e2 and I thought I was fine, and my dick was always like a noodle half limp. I didn't even realize it was because I was letting my e2 go crazy. Running eq or primo at 70% of test works wonders regardless of test dosing. Even let's say if you are using a lower dose like 200mg, you could run primo or eq at 100mg. Now dick is hard and look leaner with less water and not moody.

I would even argue testosterone drives anabolism more than harsh steroids. And that's another problem with his logic, it's not about which steroid is the safest or harshest, it's the fact that test and gh are the drivers of anabolism because they are bio identical hormones.

That's why I'm so critical of his bs. Just usual youtube bs convincing teenagers you have it figured out to gain some cult like following. You can't reason with the guy either, try leaving a comment on his page and see what happens. The dude is like a child, definitely autistic or something going on there like ketchup has mentioned.

You get big with test and gh. His logic is all steroids are the same so mg for mg so just use the safest. Masteron isn't the same as testosterone and it's not safer than testosterone.
It's funny how all roads lead back to test and GH at the end of the journey. lol We all go through the phase of wanting to run every compound under the sun, stack this with that when it comes down to moderate dosages of test, a DHT and GH yields the best/safest results.

As far as Mast and prostate: I rarely see it impact the prostate negatively. Now that's not to say certain people do but as a norm, I don't see it. A reason for the increased urination may be attributed to the drying out effect of mast, thus we excrete water as taking this such as winny.

It's so hard to pinpoint these compounds as we all know its user based.
 

Latest threads

Back
Top