• 💪 Hello, please SIGN-UP FOR A FREE account and become a member of our community!
    You will then be able to start threads, post comments and send messages to other members. Thanks!
  • 🔥 Kits4Less.com #1 MOST LAB-TESTED SOURCE — 25% OFF YOUR FIRST ORDER! 🔥

Testosterone propionate vs Testosterone cypionate ?

I prefer E over cyp only because its usually 250mg vice 200mg. But to the question, Prop may kick quicker but has a much shorter life leading to more frequent injections such as EOD. Cyp and E have longer half life and you can inject once a week or split your weekly dosage on a 2.5 day schedule.i prefer the less injection model. But I wouldn't dog anyone for choosing prop.

Edit-- I thought this was a new user asking...
 
Never used prop, only C, E, TNE and U.... my Test dosing is kinda weird but it works for me.. my body responds well to fluctuating levels... Tren too..

I would say my current cycle is probably the weirdest ever and never been done before.. :ROFLMAO:

Monday - 62.5mg Test C, 62.5mg Test E, 62.5mg Test U, 25mg TNE, 50mg Mast, 25mg Tren A, 25mg Tren Base
Wednesday - 62.5mg Test C, 62.5mg Test E, 62.5mg Test U, 25mg TNE, 50mg Mast, 25mg Tren A, 25mg Tren Base

That's it for the week.. nothing again until the following Monday... repeat....
 
I honestly don't really understand the advantages between shorter and longer esters. It's true that propionate seems to be more advantageous for ending a cycle, but other than that, that is, for users on a perpetual cruise or a long cycle, I don't know how a longer ester can benefit over a short one. The effect is supposed to be the same.
 
I honestly don't really understand the advantages between shorter and longer esters. It's true that propionate seems to be more advantageous for ending a cycle, but other than that, that is, for users on a perpetual cruise or a long cycle, I don't know how a longer ester can benefit over a short one. The effect is supposed to be the same.
pick your poison right? thats what i always say
 
Test C because I like pinning less. However, the natural test production is quite wavy, highest in the morning and decreases thereafter. So Test P might approximate nature better if injected every morning.
 
Test C for the win!
Hey bro become part of the contest to win $300 store credit .. share your reviews . Clock the link below


Jim
 
Test C for the win!
Hey bro become part of the contest to win $300 store credit .. share your reviews . Clock the link below



 
Test C for the win!
Test C because I like pinning less. However, the natural test production is quite wavy, highest in the morning and decreases thereafter. So Test P might approximate nature better if injected every morning.
Hey bro become part of the contest to win $300 store credit .. share your reviews . Clock the link below

 
SB Labs
I honestly don't really understand the advantages between shorter and longer esters. It's true that propionate seems to be more advantageous for ending a cycle, but other than that, that is, for users on a perpetual cruise or a long cycle, I don't know how a longer ester can benefit over a short one. The effect is supposed to be the same.
Hey bro become part of the contest to win $300 store credit .. share your reviews . Clock the link below


Jim
 
Why not both? I mean a mixture of C and P, say 80% C and 20% P.
It might mimic the circadian fluctuation of test while providing a solid base.
That's an interesting approach! A blend of Test C and Test P could indeed offer the benefits of stable levels with quicker peaks. Mimicking natural fluctuations is a great idea for some protocols. While most users stick to single esters for simplicity, this mix could be worth exploring depending on your goals and tolerance. Just be mindful of injection frequency and monitor how your body responds. Have you tried a similar mix before?

Jim
 
That's an interesting approach! A blend of Test C and Test P could indeed offer the benefits of stable levels with quicker peaks. Mimicking natural fluctuations is a great idea for some protocols. While most users stick to single esters for simplicity, this mix could be worth exploring depending on your goals and tolerance. Just be mindful of injection frequency and monitor how your body responds. Have you tried a similar mix before?

Jim
Or just duplicate the original esters in Sustanon since prop was one of them?
 
That's an interesting approach! A blend of Test C and Test P could indeed offer the benefits of stable levels with quicker peaks. Mimicking natural fluctuations is a great idea for some protocols. While most users stick to single esters for simplicity, this mix could be worth exploring depending on your goals and tolerance. Just be mindful of injection frequency and monitor how your body responds. Have you tried a similar mix before?

Jim
No, I haven't tried the mix. I had some free time today and tried to approximate daily fluctuations of test on steroid plotter using various compounds.
 

Latest threads

Back
Top