People that don’t use the new pronouns to describe someones gender really grinds my gears. I mean, come on
I’m gonna go ahead and assume this is a joke.
And anyway that’s not how languages work. Words come into being because they are already in common use by some group of people and then they are acknowledged in the various dictionaries.
That’s how millennial dipshits got words like guac and hangry and humblebrag added to the current dictionary; by using them constantly until they became commonplace.
You can’t just throw a temper tantrum and insist on being called some nonsense word that no one is using.
Maybe if they keep pushing this agenda eventually they will win and some of those terms will be in common use. But not today.
Also, we generally reserve more simplified terms for concepts that are acknowledged to be basically universal. Like war, love, sky, god him, her, etc.
The more rarely a concept is used in the society, the more complex the word(s) used to describe them will be. Like sustainability or regionalism or post-industrial or trans-gender.
Demanding that we use an extremely simple word form to describe a concept that pertains to a very, very small percentage of the population is trying to shove a round block into a square hole. It just doesn’t work.
Hence the currently in-use, and very complicated acronym, LGBTQ and it’s even more complicated and obscure cousin, LGBTQIAPK.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk