because trans is not gay or straight.
Trans Movement
- Thread starter GYMnTONIC
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2015
- Messages
- 29,044
- Reaction score
- 41,436
Do you want the truth? Brace yourself. Because gay and straight aren't "cool" or "in" any more. Nor are they special in any way, shape, or form. If you don't look like some methed out my little pony that crashed into a body piercing studio that was next door to a tattoo parlor ran by junior high bathroom artists, you ain't shit. You're as vanilla as they come.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2015
- Messages
- 29,044
- Reaction score
- 41,436
Probably because those minority groups are super litigious and will sue the socks off anyone who doesn't represent them in their products or services. It's far simpler to throw something in, even if it is completely unnecessary.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2015
- Messages
- 29,044
- Reaction score
- 41,436
Battousai
Registered
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2022
- Messages
- 1,300
- Reaction score
- 1,787
Alex Jones and Steven Crowder were actually talking about this today. Sickening world.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2015
- Messages
- 29,044
- Reaction score
- 41,436
bwahahahaa....it takes a minute, but it gets better
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2014
- Messages
- 15,612
- Reaction score
- 24,063
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2014
- Messages
- 15,612
- Reaction score
- 24,063
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2015
- Messages
- 29,044
- Reaction score
- 41,436
Remember when teaching your kids to "tuck" meant their shirt was inside their pants?
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2015
- Messages
- 29,044
- Reaction score
- 41,436
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2019
- Messages
- 1,852
- Reaction score
- 2,800
"Sex offenders are another population that is most vulnerable."
LOL. Okay. Apparently, the kids he molested aren't "vulnerable" though.
You can't drink alcohol until you're 21, but you can vote at 18 and decide to undergo life changing, irreversible sex changes at 12.
It all makes perfect sense to me. I don't see a problem here.
🤡🌎
LOL. Okay. Apparently, the kids he molested aren't "vulnerable" though.
You can't drink alcohol until you're 21, but you can vote at 18 and decide to undergo life changing, irreversible sex changes at 12.
It all makes perfect sense to me. I don't see a problem here.
🤡🌎
Another day, another trans model – why must advertisers troll women?
I have no beef with transgender people, but women are being displaced and replaced in adverts that are actually aimed at us
www.telegraph.co.uk
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2012
- Messages
- 14,243
- Reaction score
- 6,118
I have a very hard time taking your point seriously when your arguments are supported by twitter and TikTok.
I’ll ignore the fact they’re coming from a guy who sexualizes women on the level that you do. I love your AVI but it doesn’t reflect your arguments.
“Trans Rights” Means Trans Entitlements and the End of Civil Society
Wendy McElroyA “civil society” is a community of individuals who are linked together by common interests and activities. Common interests include being able to walk the streets safely
(peace) and to exercise such rights as freedom of speech (individual freedom). These shared interests allow common activities to flourish, including commerce and the education of children.
Civil society is possible only because most people want to live securely, protect their loved ones, and prosper. This laissez-faire attitude used to be a defining characteristic of Americans, but an engineered and well-financed cultural war is destroying America’s renowned tolerance. If the common interests of society break down and peace and freedom are replaced by violence and privilege, then common activities like free-market commerce and education cannot function.
One movement captures the raw destruction of this culture war against civil society—a demand for “Trans rights!” blasts across America. But a sharp backlash against it has also developed, epitomized by the boycott of Bud Light beer over the company’s use of trans activist Dylan Mulvaney as a new “woman” ambassador for its brand.
The media characterizes this backlash as antitrans hatred by conservatives, Christians, and other troglodytes.
But few people care about the sexual or gender orientation of their neighbors. Critics of the trans movement are rebelling against the forced redefinition of biology, the destruction of women’s sports by trans athletes, the hijacking of children’s education, the medical experiment of gender-transitioning children, and the intrusion of penises in women-only spaces like bathrooms, locker rooms, prisons, and shelters. Critics don’t want to oppress anyone; they want a return to civil society of peace and individual rights.
To understand why the “trans rights” movement has caused such damage, it is necessary to ask three questions.
1. What is a “transgendered” person?
2. What are “rights”?
3. What is produced by the actions the movement takes?
What is a transgendered person? Already we’re in trouble. Many prominent intellectuals today can’t even answer the simpler question, What is a woman? This article uses a common definition: “Transgender describes people whose gender identity does not match their assigned gender at birth.” It is one of many gender categories being advanced by social justice. There are as many as eighty-one distinct categories, all of which are said to be fluid or constructed over time.
Politically speaking, transgenderism and the other gender categories are a continuation of identity politics. This is a fairly standard definition of identity politics: “The politics of group-based movements claiming torepresent the interests and identity of a particular group, rather than policy issues relating to all members of the community. The group identity may be based on ethnicity, class, religion, sex, sexuality, or other criteria” (emphasis added). It is an attempt to splinter society into groups and categories, all of which are at war with each other because their interests are said to conflict. What does this war look like?
Consider a controversial example: gender transitioning. This is when a person uses reassignment therapy, hormone replacement, and sex reassignment surgery to change their birth sex. Few argue against the gender transition of adults who pay for the process themselves. But the trans movement demands the gender transitioning of children, often at taxpayer expense; that is, a tomboy might become a “boy” through methods that include irreversible surgery.
There are at least two flash points here. One is the minimum age at which a person should transition. The World Professional Association for Transgender Health claims hormones can start at age fourteen and some surgeries at fifteen—in other words, at the height of a teenager’s sexual confusion. Recently, a licensed social worker at a children’s medical center in Austin, Texas, was reportedly recorded as saying the center provided gender modification to children as young as eight. On April 25, Senator
Ted Cruz and Representative Chip Roy submitted a formal request to the center for information on how gender dysphoria is diagnosed, how federal dollars are spent in the process, and whether patients under eighteen underwent “experimental medical procedures.”
The group war here is between a child’s right against physical abuse and trans activists’ demands for children’s access to transition. The other flash point is that transitions are often performed without parental consent or despite parental objections. The rights war here—trans activists are usurping traditional parental rights, and parents are outraged.
The idea that the rights of one group conflict with those of another is perverse because it destroys the very basis of human rights. Human rights are universal because they are rooted in human nature. All human beings possess the same rights to the same degree. Rights are not based on secondary characteristics such as gender; they rest on a shared humanity. In other words, a trans person has the same rights to the same degree as every other person in society. No more, no less.
The “rights” demanded by trans activists are actually entitlements or group privileges. This is made clear by the claim of historical oppression, which is used to justify many demands. What is really being claimed is victimhood, upon which their entitlements are based. For trans activists to sustain their victimhood status, however, those who oppose them must be cast as oppressors and endless haters. Conveniently, this characterization removes the need to deal with any argument the “haters” present, such as the need for real human rights.
Again, this trans stance is a perversion. If the trans movement has been historically oppressed—and I do not argue against this—then the movement should value individual rights more than the average person. These freedoms are how an aggrieved individual rises to his or her feet. But trans activists do not want to be treated as equal individuals; they want to be a privileged group that imposes huge costs on the majority of society to their great benefit. Individual rights are an obstacle.
Gender transition is one area in which civil society is being replaced with civil warfare, but there are many others:
- Trans “women” housed in women-only venues, like prisons and shelters, put biological women there at risk of sexual assault. Rapes are already happening.
- Trans curricula in American public schools indoctrinate children at the expense of teaching basic life skills, like math and literacy.
- A prominent doctor on Fox News warned, “First-year medical students [are] exposed to woke ‘sex and gender primer’ lesson.” This shifts the focus away from medical problems; it could also damage relationships with patients who do not share woke ideology or are not in a privileged group. The same is happening in law schools.
- The trans agenda violates constitutionally guaranteed freedom of speech in myriad ways, from forcing schools to use pronouns like “xe” and “hir” to shouting down speakers or violently attacking them.
- Draconian hate speech laws are destroying meaningful public discourse. A new bill passing through the Irish parliament, for example, outlaws communication or the possession of material that might incite hatred against “protected” classes, including gender. This is punishable by up to five years in prison.
- The demand to include trans athletes in women’s sports is destroying the entire field.
- Transitioned children who deeply regret transitioning are generally silenced or dismissed.
The media and authorities richly deserve this summary judgment from the public. Consider how they handle acts of violence. Every act of violence against a trans person seems to be widely reported and condemned, as it should be. But trans violence against biological women or other outsiders seems to be ignored or excused. Even the trans shooter in Nashville who killed three nine-year-old school children and three adults is protected by authorities who refuse to release the shooter’s manifesto. And media reports often expressed more concern about a backlash against trans people than about the dead children. SAVE Services, an agency that works to assure due process and fairness in schools, has an interesting page called “Stop the Wave of Transgender Violence” where many cases of trans violence are documented. In this environment, it is simply not possible to know what’s true about the levels of violence and against whom.
I would end by asking, can a more general violence—a savage civil unrest—be far behind? I believe it is already here.
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2018
- Messages
- 15,415
- Reaction score
- 15,158
His Sexualizing of age appropriate adult women amongst male friends is hardly worthy of whatever arguement your making of who gets to decide what’s appropriate when it comes to minor children being sexualized with books and clothing and targeted by corporations.
I mean, Tommy, come on man. How far will you go to detract from and or defend your party lines?
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2015
- Messages
- 29,044
- Reaction score
- 41,436
![tumblr_mm8gulQvoz1s3g3ago1_500[1].gif](https://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/data/attachments/93/93359-4ea89679122d2132108987d014a1517b.jpg "tumblr_mm8gulQvoz1s3g3ago1_500[1].gif")
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2017
- Messages
- 5,900
- Reaction score
- 7,841
I have said this before about any of these groups that choose to force their issues on the general public.
The majority of America doesn't know a gay guy, a lesbian, a trans or any of the other alphabet soup. They probably don't even know any black people or indians or even a canadian. So they really don't have an opinion one way or the other. I am willing to bet all of these unexposed Americans believe that people should be treated equally and no one should be looked down on, denigrated or be discriminated against.
But when you are Bubba Bopeep in the heart of the Appalachians, just trying to live and look after your family, being called every "____phobic" word they can invent and being being TOLD that you MUST not only accept but virtually need to foist a rainbow flag from the pole in your front yard, OVER the top of stars and bars...well, you are not going to be getting the favorable attention that you seek. In fact, if they haven't figured it out already, it works significantly AGAINST the agenda.
I can really give a shit about the agenda and I definitely want everyone to be treated the same or at the least, not discriminated against. But this "inclusion" shit is out of control. I mean, each and every commercial now has a mixed race couple. So the norm now that a white couple with white kids will be considered unusual in commercials or even in TV shows. It is idiotic. I saw a commercial with a white woman, a black husband (I assume) and a chong kid. No kidding. Yep, that's the normal and broad market representation. SMDH....
The majority of America doesn't know a gay guy, a lesbian, a trans or any of the other alphabet soup. They probably don't even know any black people or indians or even a canadian. So they really don't have an opinion one way or the other. I am willing to bet all of these unexposed Americans believe that people should be treated equally and no one should be looked down on, denigrated or be discriminated against.
But when you are Bubba Bopeep in the heart of the Appalachians, just trying to live and look after your family, being called every "____phobic" word they can invent and being being TOLD that you MUST not only accept but virtually need to foist a rainbow flag from the pole in your front yard, OVER the top of stars and bars...well, you are not going to be getting the favorable attention that you seek. In fact, if they haven't figured it out already, it works significantly AGAINST the agenda.
I can really give a shit about the agenda and I definitely want everyone to be treated the same or at the least, not discriminated against. But this "inclusion" shit is out of control. I mean, each and every commercial now has a mixed race couple. So the norm now that a white couple with white kids will be considered unusual in commercials or even in TV shows. It is idiotic. I saw a commercial with a white woman, a black husband (I assume) and a chong kid. No kidding. Yep, that's the normal and broad market representation. SMDH....
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2012
- Messages
- 14,243
- Reaction score
- 6,118
You’re still pissing up a rope.
Try making a point without someone else putting it in your head.
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2012
- Messages
- 14,243
- Reaction score
- 6,118
Which is it? Detract or defend? Big difference homie.
And as far as “sexualizing age appropriate women”? Is that what conservatives consider acceptable? Does that support a biblical vision of decency?
Can’t walk on both sides of the fence.
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2012
- Messages
- 17,446
- Reaction score
- 8,909
my kids are teens and I'm pretty confident they have a normal sexual attraction, I honestly can say I didnt put any thoughts into their head of what they need to choose in life. I would really hate it if they became a trans, but if they did and after making sure they research their choice, I would support them getting testosterone scripts for their father
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2015
- Messages
- 5,586
- Reaction score
- 6,157
- Age
- 56
Tuk Tok
Libturdia
Libturdia
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2018
- Messages
- 15,415
- Reaction score
- 15,158
“Detract from and or defend “ works in context. You either detract the value in our concerns over this strange pedo lgbt push on our kids or you defend their actions each and every time.
As far as both sides of the fence goes…. I respect the fact that you chose your side and seem to be willing to die on every hill your team decides they want to capture. But, your clearly on the wrong side of history here and you will undoubtedly regret it, in the long run.
So what you are saying is, that as an adult male who clearly lusts over beautiful adult females we are no different then the lgbtq pedo groups who clearly lust over minors? Is that your argument?
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2012
- Messages
- 14,243
- Reaction score
- 6,118
No, what I’m saying is you either have a Christian conscience and you follow it or you don’t. You won’t find me in the Bible thread as a married man, preaching the word, while my AVI jiggles another woman’s breast’s. You also won’t find me defending or detracting from anything illegal or immoral. I live a law abiding, good neighbor life and I don’t lust over every pair of tits that I see. As far as the side of the fence I’m on….my side doesn’t give me the sinner get out of jail card.
Like hypocrite “Christians”.
I know that’s abstract thinking for some, but I also know you’re smart enough to understand it.
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2012
- Messages
- 1,708
- Reaction score
- 2,217
- Age
- 123
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone Tommy. You're arguements don't sway anyone other than fools and your atheist word magic collaborators.
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2012
- Messages
- 14,243
- Reaction score
- 6,118
Truckertrash
Registered
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2023
- Messages
- 82
- Reaction score
- 176
Definitely not isolated at all. Going on in my area as we speak. I have no problems w gay people, Trans, etc..I think people should be free to live their lives as they choose. I have a huge problem however, that this is an all ages event. I think it's sick that they would even consider exposing children to this
Attachments
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2012
- Messages
- 1,708
- Reaction score
- 2,217
- Age
- 123
So you are an atheist. That makes sense.
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2012
- Messages
- 14,243
- Reaction score
- 6,118
Yes.
I’ve said it many, many times.
But I respect your right of freedom to practice religion without persecution.
Peace.