Just my opinion my friend and you do what works for you, but at 200mg of test a week you don't need HCG and AI. Everyone that knows me are aware how I feel about AI's and the damage it causes more that benefits. In over 30 years of cycling I have only taking AI's for a very short period of time due to high volume and blood proven that E2 was extremely high. I doubt your E2 at 200mg requires AI. If you haven't done so go ahead and get blood work and see what your estrogen levels are before taking AI's. Also I have three kids and never had to use HCG.
Again if it works for you great, just sharing my personal experience.
Also have a post regarding dangers of AI. You might want to take a look.
To the original poster, our brother wiseguy brings up some very good points right here with the potential dangers and hazards with using AIs..
Whenever we talk about gear we're running cycles, people immediately are already thinking about anti-estrogens and what dosages.
It wasn't so long ago that we didn't even know what an AI was, Now it's all over the internet on every regurgitated staple cycle.
They really are not necessary unless blood work indicates that level super succeed well above the expected elevation levels.
What does that statement mean?
When test goes up, so will your estrogen and many other hormones.. that is actually perfectly natural.
It's okay and perfectly safe to see elevated estrogen when testosterone is also elevated.
But what's not okay is when people try to ramp up test at supraphysiological levels, yet they are attempting to try and keep their estrogen within the textbook spectrum window. No dice.
People run away from estrogen like it's the boogeyman, Now unless we're going on stage there's nothing to worry about.
We don't need to obliterate it or nuke it, And there's also methods and protocols with diets and some compounds that we can add where we are not suppressing the estrogen but rather making our body impervious to its presence.
ER's (estrogen receptors) are found throughout the body, all over the place, some RECs are ultra sensitive with obvious reasons, and others they do things that do not affect us and you have no clue about.
It's more advisable to treat estrogen by way of it cellular interaction at specific receptors rather than just trying to remove it entirely from the equation. Because other receptors in the body actually need and rely on estrogen for many, many other different functionalities.
The obvious receptors here that we would like to treat and target, would be those that are on the glandular duct tissue in we're around the breast..
Tamoxifen is a great drug to employ on occasions to simply turn the noise down a little bit, and occupy those receptor sites, basically putting a ghillie suit on the receptors and estrogen leaves them alone and it passes on by harmlessly..