Glad you and your wife recovered, bro.
The math here needs a little work, however. Quick calculation of 32,000 (rounded) to 1% gives us 320. No calculator required. Deaths at 414 means we have around 1.3% fatality rate, 13x higher than 0.1%.
But we also have two opposing forces against any of these conclusions, making everything fudge at the moment. Nearly all these cases are fresh, meaning many of them will yet die and raise that fatality rate. And we also know the US has screwed the pooch pretty hard on having tests available, so the actual number of infected could easily be 5x, 10x, 20x or more of the 32,356 figure. We really have no real clue yet. Having a much higher "infected" figure will lower any calculated fatality rate.
Therefore, with an unknown infected rate (that, even if known, is growing almost exponentially anyway) and a fatality rate still in progress, none of these numbers are settled.
The Johns Hopkins count now is 35,345 infected and 473 dead for the US. It's still spiking up -- both from the epidemic spreading and tests becoming available.
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6
A better measure of a real fatality rate might be visible in South Korea where they've weathered the first wave of the disease. They still have a great many infected and recovering, and therefore may yet die. It's currently 8,961 infected and 111 dead (check that ARCGIS map). That's higher than 1%, and with more deaths coming that'll only climb. AND, most importantly, they had a FAR BETTER response to the epidemic than we could manage. Quick quarantines, drive-thru testing with fast results, etc. They're like an advanced society and we're 2nd world in comparison. Sucks. So I wouldn't assume we'll do as well as they did. Maybe we'll have a 2% fatality rate in the end, and... 5-10% population eventually infected? No one knows of course, but if those figures are close then it'll be 30,000,000 infected and 600,000 dead. Far worse than any flu season. We'll see.