Nocode8511
Registered
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2012
- Messages
- 3,806
- Reaction score
- 450
- Points
- 83
Has anyone ran them? Can you give a rundown on your cycle, pros and cons. Thanks
Gw, mk677. Lgd, rad 140, osta.Has anyone ran them? Can you give a rundown on your cycle, pros and cons. Thanks
I will always tell someone who is interested in sarms to try out s4. I’ve ran it 5 times now anywhere from 50-100mg ED and the strength and recomp from that compound are amazing...if you can handle the vision side effects. They are very real and can be quite annoying, but I feel like I’m on anavar while using it and it’s half he cost
I will always tell someone who is interested in sarms to try out s4. I’ve ran it 5 times now anywhere from 50-100mg ED and the strength and recomp from that compound are amazing...if you can handle the vision side effects. They are very real and can be quite annoying, but I feel like I’m on anavar while using it and it’s half he cost
An honest question - Why would someone take a SARM over real AAS?
I have a ton of clients that want an "anabolic" style effect minus doing injections. It's very common. Plus the are otc at the moment and easier to obtain.
SARMS have very small/mild improvements like testosterone with less side effects in general. That is why people like them.
I personally use a transdermal SR9009+RAD140 blend every single day. Low dose. 10mgs. It gives me insane endurance in the gym, at 30mgs I would say I prefer it over EPO. Also it has fat burning effects and is very safe. I stack it with my prescribed HRT and I am very pleased with the results. Mind you I am not competing anymore
If I was competing, I would not use SARMS, I would go full out with AAS, but honestly, the thing about Sarms is alot of them have varying benefits that AAS cannot give you. For instance, s23 was the driest compound I have ever used. I got so dry and grainy on it, not even Mast or Tren compared for that ONE result. So these are "PED's". You gotta take that for what it's worth. None of the sarms are going to compete with Testosterone for overall size for instance, but they are very good tools.
Injectable SR9009 is awesome. LGD is probably the best bulker. S23 and ostarine act a bit like var if you dose them right. YK has alot of rave reviews where people feel good and have alot of aggression and libido increases. You really have to consider their specific features if you are going to choose one or two.
The vision issues are very prevalent for me even at 50mg ED, so it’s definitely something people need to consider before taking it. The good news is if you do take it and decide the vision sides outweigh the benefits you can simply stop taking it and they will go away within a day or two. The reason I take sarms is because they are only mildly suppressive and since I am young and still doing PCT’s and cycling, they are a good way to bridge between cycles and still recover.That was on the top of my list to try until I read about the vision issues. I have big problems with my vision due to a corneal disease and that's not something I fuck around with. After that I kinda just wrote all of them off thinking that real AAS would be better.
An honest question - Why would someone take a SARM over real AAS?
GW1516 is in injectable form