It has not been proven in Court that Election fraud did not occur and it has not been proven that the machines were not compromised.
Well wait a second..
Dominion had the allegations made against them.
She had NUMEROUS chances to prove what she said. She did not. Nobody has.
So every election dominion is REQUIRED IN COURT to prove no fraud?
Did this happen with Trump when he won?
Sir this is a civil court case
Preponderence of evidence. You have to prove YOUR case. Dominion has to PROVE their case.
Sidney doesn't have to prove she is innocent. That is CRIMINAL law. You guys are confusing the two.
And yes, in the case of Trump, several Democrats tried to get the Electors thrown out or changed and it did not work. Yet hillariously they were scared he would attempt to do the same to them.
And if it weren't for the Jan 6th "insurrection" staged, that then made the vote go into the wee hours of the night, we may have seen Congress actually discuss the "electors" being rejected, etc.
The thing about the Democrats, is they are all actors. Which is why they love Hollyweird.
All this is my friends is OPTICS. They think that if they file their lawsuit, that their party and followers will believe they have more validity. They also hope to convince the unsure, that no election fraud occured.
Notice in Congress, the dems wanted to punish those who said 'election fraud occured'. But those same idiots for 4 years cried that Russia hacked the Election for Trump, and we know that was as fake as anything we have seen.
Some fools still believe the Russia Hoax.
Brainwashing is strong in many.