Found what I was looking for and recalled from 20 years ago. The difference is Trump has not conceded, however following the law, and the Presidential Act of 1963, the GSA is supposed to release the funds.
If you notice, this means that Clinton was with-holding the funds from Bush. In this case though they had Gore the "projected" winner. And the Dems were not remotely upset that Clintons Admin wouldn't release the funds. And in fact they only did after "concession"
I just wanted to point out the hypocrisy here and also the standard that the GSA has.
This in no way means Trump lost the Election. There is no "official" "projected" President Elect for 2020.
Sure some States have become "official" This does not mean that those States or the entire Election can't be overturned.
Has it happened per State before. Yes. For the whole election, as a whole before? No
Doesn't mean impossible.
GSA releases transition funds
December 14, 2000
https://www.govexec.com/federal-news/2000/12/gsa-releases-transition-funds/8146/
After Vice President Al Gore conceded the presidential election to Texas Gov. George W. Bush Wednesday night, General Services Administration chief David Barram announced that GSA would release transition funds and provide office space to the Bush transition team.
Republican lawmakers had criticized Barram's decision to withhold transition funds pending Gore's challenge to election results in Florida. Last week, Rep. Steve Horn, R-Calif., chairman of the House Government Reform Subcommittee on Government Management, Information and Technology, held hearings on the issue. Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., then introduced a bill that would've required GSA to support the Bush transition.
Barram had said he would not release the funds until an "apparent successful candidate" had been determined, as mandated in the Presidential Transition Act of 1963. The Transition Act requires GSA to provide federal money, office space and other logistical support to the incoming and outgoing administrations
