TheSilverSurfer
Registered
- Joined
- May 7, 2017
- Messages
- 72
- Reaction score
- 13
- Points
- 8
Trillions? LOL!Are u nuts? we spend trillions in Military, yet ppl are upset (myself included)about the $150 a month and food stamps welfare recipients receive every month
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
I can't see your image, but I've seen a pie chart and it's ridiculousTrillions? LOL!
Try not even one trillion . . .
View attachment 26760
521.7 billion in 2016, and 2017 is projected to be only $2 billion more, which is only one third of one percent increase, or actually a reduction when taking into account inflation.
Are u nuts? we spend trillions in Military, yet ppl are upset (myself included)about the $150 a month and food stamps welfare recipients receive every month
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
How is it not pertinent? Your post says we don't invest in our security.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
But I traveled in time using my power cosmic to answer your postMy post has absolutely nothing to do with military spending....yet
Your absolutely right bro, that's why I posted 2 charts, either way, the govt has a spending problemI'm a big supporter of stats to try to abolish ignorance (although it mostly fails anyway) but be careful with the pie charts above.
The first one is discretionary spending only, leaving out half of the federal budget.
The second chart has the bigger picture, although Medicare and Medicaid have been lumped together, and the military budget is quietly being sliced into multiple pieces: VA expenses are separated, the half of the DoE budget going to nuclear weapons production and maintenance is separated (and lumped together with solar energy research, geothermal, etc, ironically), and of course whatever portion of the interest on the debt that was generated by military spending in previous years. The real military budget is more like 23-25%. Used to be much closer to 50% in the Reagan era and even higher during Vietnam and decades before that. Military spending has still grown over the decades but the economy has grown even more, and healthcare costs and old age pensions have grown faster than everything else.
This is the part that truly worries me. Not the cost. The trend. The demographic changes (less younger workers paying compared to more older retirees collecting). The inevitability of what seems to be coming, and we keep kicking the can down the road. Neither party is interested in doing anything about it.and healthcare costs and old age pensions have grown faster than everything else.