- Joined
- Dec 24, 2013
- Messages
- 11,512
- Reaction score
- 782
- Points
- 121
So like a lot of people when I started training again I wanted to move bigger weights faster. When I started squatting the first thing I did was get a belt and follow starting strength. Pretty quick I was squatting 285x5 and 6 months ago I got up to 365 for a single and 225x20. Well I wound up with two nagging low back injuries. 6 months of limited leg work because I hate machines and I have lost a lot is strength in my squat. How much is hard to gage because I'm not going heavy and I'm refusing to use a belt. Which brings me to my question:
Do you think it's possible to "belt cripple" yourself by going to the belt to fast? My lower back is the first thing to get worn out and at first I thought it was a form issue, but I filmed myself, ran it by some people and I seem to keep a nice neutral spine all the way through. I'm starting over onnsquats. I'm working my way back to my old GVT routine by adding a set a week. When I get there I'm jumping to 225x8x4 and then I'll follow another progression. All with no belt. Does this make sense to anyone else? My goal is to not be using a belt until I'm repping over 315 again all for the sake of AVOIDING any more low back injuries.
Open for opinions and broscience. TIA
Do you think it's possible to "belt cripple" yourself by going to the belt to fast? My lower back is the first thing to get worn out and at first I thought it was a form issue, but I filmed myself, ran it by some people and I seem to keep a nice neutral spine all the way through. I'm starting over onnsquats. I'm working my way back to my old GVT routine by adding a set a week. When I get there I'm jumping to 225x8x4 and then I'll follow another progression. All with no belt. Does this make sense to anyone else? My goal is to not be using a belt until I'm repping over 315 again all for the sake of AVOIDING any more low back injuries.
Open for opinions and broscience. TIA