I go heavy as hell low reps at the end go light reps to failure pump all that blood into the muscle!
What do you think will break a muscle down more... 4 sets @...6 reps at 315..or, 12 reps at 250.. Or,
20(failure) reps at 225... And you wonder why the pros don't go crazy heavy, they can, but they dont... Theres nothing wrong with having heavy days/workouts from time to time, but to grow you need to fully break down the muscle, feed it, and recover... Repeat...
two ways to build muscle
1. heavy reps to tear down the muslce fiber and then you let it recover and grow - longer wait before working the same muscle group again
2. lighter weight higher reps to fill the muscle w/ blood therefore shuttling more nutrients in - can work the same more muscle more frequently.
Most younger guys will go w/ option 1 as it's more of an ego lift routine. Older guys a lot of the time will opt for #2 as it's easier on the joints and less chance of injury.
I tend to mix the two. I do more #2 for frequency but mix in #1 occasionally to push the muscle and add strength.
Well. There is going to be a differ of opinions on that matter. I am one that high reps don't work for. I get small and weak. Here is an example of a kid I used to work out with from time to time. He was used to doing high reps. Obviously, he got used to the higher reps and wasn't taxing his CNS. So, I put him through a workout I had modified to work for me. Low reps, heavier weights. Which went like this 3x5 adding 10lbs per set. Drop 10lbs 3x3 adding 10lbs per set. Drop 10lbs 1x3 adding 10lbs per set. This was a chest day no less and he was puking before we got done with the triples. Every last ounce of size I carry is due to sets lower than 6 reps for the most part. You need to do the experimenting and see what works for your body. There is no one right way.
I do everything on a Swiss ball so it's all about functional strength.
I do everything on a Swiss ball so it's all about functional strength.